When Jesus walked the earth, He frequently spoke in parables—short, symbolic stories that conveyed profound spiritual truths. His disciples often struggled to understand them, and even the crowds were left puzzled by His teachings. Yet, when we turn to the rest of the New Testament, something striking stands out: the apostles never used parables in their teaching, preaching, or writings.
Why is that? If parables were such a significant part of Jesus’ ministry, why did Paul, Peter, James, John, and the other apostles never rely on them to instruct the early Church?
The answer to this question provides a clear distinction between Jesus’ Kingdom message to Israel and the apostolic teaching for the Church Age. By exploring Jesus’ use of parables, the reason He shifted to them, and the apostles’ complete departure from this method, we gain valuable insight into the difference between the Kingdom program and the Church’s mission.
Words: 1221 / Time to read: 6 minutes
Why Did Jesus Begin Teaching in Parables?
Early in His ministry, Jesus did not use parables as His primary teaching method. Instead, He preached openly about the coming Kingdom of God, calling Israel to repentance and faith in the Messiah. However, a turning point occurred in Matthew 12 when the religious leaders of Israel officially rejected Jesus as their King by accusing Him of casting out demons by the power of Satan (Matthew 12:22-32).
This rejection led to a shift in Jesus’ approach to teaching. In Matthew 13, immediately after this rejection, Jesus began speaking almost exclusively in parables—a stark contrast from His earlier straightforward messages.
When His disciples asked Him why He was now using parables, Jesus gave a revealing answer:
“The knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you, but not to them. Whoever has will be given more, and they will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what they have will be taken from them. This is why I speak to them in parables: ‘Though seeing, they do not see; though hearing, they do not hear or understand.’” (Matthew 13:11-13)
This statement highlights a twofold purpose for parables:
- To reveal truth to those who had faith (His disciples).
- To conceal truth from those who had rejected Him (the unbelieving crowds and religious leaders).
Jesus’ parables were not just clever illustrations or sermon anecdotes—they were deliberate forms of communication that separated those who were spiritually open from those who were hardened in unbelief. The parables were not intended as moral lessons for general application but were coded messages about the Kingdom program that only those with spiritual discernment could grasp (Matthew 13:16-17).
This explains why many of Jesus’ parables deal with the mysteries of the Kingdom, such as:
- The Parable of the Sower (Matthew 13:3-9, 18-23): Different responses to the Kingdom message.
- The Parable of the Wheat and the Weeds (Matthew 13:24-30, 36-43): The coexistence of true and false believers until the final judgment.
- The Parable of the Mustard Seed (Matthew 13:31-32): The Kingdom’s unexpected growth despite initial rejection.
Thus, Jesus’ parables were Kingdom-focused, explaining how God’s plan would unfold after Israel rejected her King—a mystery not previously revealed in the Old Testament.
The Parables Are Not Church Doctrine
A common theological error is assuming that Jesus’ parables provide direct instructions for the Church. However, the Church was not yet revealed during Jesus’ earthly ministry. The Church is a distinct entity that was formed at Pentecost (Acts 2) and consists of Jew and Gentile united in one body (Ephesians 3:6).
The apostolic writings provide the doctrinal foundation for the Church Age, while Jesus’ parables serve a different purpose—explaining how the Kingdom program unfolds in light of Israel’s rejection.
Several key points support this distinction:
1. The Apostles Did Not Use Parables to Teach Church Doctrine
The New Testament epistles provide clear, propositional teaching for believers. Nowhere do the apostles repeat or rely on Jesus’ parables to establish Church Age doctrine. Instead, they use direct teaching regarding salvation, grace, sanctification, and eschatology.
Paul wrote:
“Rather, we have renounced secret and shameful ways; we do not use deception, nor do we distort the word of God. On the contrary, by setting forth the truth plainly we commend ourselves to everyone’s conscience in the sight of God.” (2 Corinthians 4:2)
This is a stark contrast to Jesus’ statement that He spoke in parables to conceal truth from those who were unwilling to believe (Matthew 13:11-13).
The apostles were not obscuring doctrine—they were revealing it plainly as part of the New Testament revelation of the Church Age.
2. The Parables Do Not Contain the Mysteries of the Church
The mystery of the Church—that Jew and Gentile would be one body in Christ—was a separate revelation given to Paul:
“That is, the mystery made known to me by revelation, as I have already written briefly. In reading this, then, you will be able to understand my insight into the mystery of Christ, which was not made known to people in other generations as it has now been revealed by the Spirit to God’s holy apostles and prophets.” (Ephesians 3:3-5)
Jesus’ parables focus on the mystery of the Kingdom, not the mystery of the Church. The apostles, under divine inspiration, were given new revelation about the Church and never referred back to Jesus’ parables to explain Church doctrine.
3. The Kingdom Program Is Distinct from the Church
While the Church has a role in God’s Kingdom purposes, it is not the Kingdom itself. The Kingdom in its fullness will be established at Christ’s Second Coming, when He reigns as King over Israel and the nations (Revelation 20:1-6).
The present Church Age is a parenthesis in God’s Kingdom program—not its culmination. This is why the apostles taught about:
- The future restoration of Israel (Romans 11:25-26).
- The coming reign of Christ (2 Timothy 2:12).
- The Rapture and Tribulation as separate from the Kingdom’s establishment (1 Thessalonians 4:16-17; Revelation 19:11-16).
This further explains why the apostles abandoned parables—they were focused on proclaiming new, revealed truth, not the hidden Kingdom program that Jesus described in parables.
Conclusion: The Apostles Abandoned Parables for a Clearer Message
The fact that no apostle referenced or explained Jesus’ parables in their letters is proof that:
🔹 Parables were designed for Israel, not the Church Age.
🔹 Jesus used parables to conceal truth, while the apostles revealed truth.
🔹 The apostles received new revelation for the Church, which required clear teaching.
For those in the Church Age, our faith is not based on obscured or hidden teachings, but on the full, open, and unshakable promises of God.
“We have this hope as an anchor for the soul, firm and secure. It enters the inner sanctuary behind the curtain.” (Hebrews 6:19)
Unlike those who struggled to understand Jesus’ parables, we have direct access to the truth—no veil, no obscurity, no hidden meanings. The mystery has been revealed, and our hope is anchored in Christ, unwavering and clear.
The apostles did not use parables because they were entrusted with proclaiming that which was now fully disclosed—the eternal hope of salvation through Jesus Christ.
All Scripture quoted from:
New International Version (NIV)
Holy Bible, New International Version®, NIV® Copyright ©1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.® Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide.